Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:51:31 -0500 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comments about FreeBSD threading from Apache people Message-ID: <20031113045131.GA5544@crodrigues.org> In-Reply-To: <20031111005826.GA98288@crodrigues.org> References: <20031110070111.GA65707@crodrigues.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10311100854050.6872-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20031111005826.GA98288@crodrigues.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I compiled httpd-2.0.47 from apache.org, and compiled the latest APR from ports with threading (-lc_r) enabled. This was with a -CURRENT, cvsup'd from last week. I was able to reproduce the behavior that Justin Erenkrantz outlined with libc_r. I then added the following to /etc/libmap.conf: [/opt/home/rodrigc/httpd/bin/httpd] libc_r.so libkse.so libc_r.so.5 libkse.so.1 At this point, Apache worked fine. So, I can understand from the Apache point of view why they don't want to enable threads by default in APR. This whole discussion came about because I maintain the APR port for FreeBSD, and recently tried to push some threading configury fixes upstream back to the APR maintainers, and they balked. I'd still like to push my APR changes upstream to them, but maybe with threads disabled by default on FreeBSD, instead of enabled by default as I had in my patch. How close are we to having libkse as the default threading library on FreeBSD? The ports maintainers define PTHREAD_LIBS to be -pthread on older FreeBSD's, and -lc_r on newer ( > 500016) and do not tell people to explicitly link to -lkse. Thanks. -- Craig Rodrigues http://crodrigues.org rodrigc@crodrigues.org On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:58:26PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> ----- > X-Originating-IP: [216.220.40.247] > Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm > Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org > Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:51:24 -0800 > From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> > To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> > Cc: dev@apr.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] FreeBSD threads configure support > > Roughly, the test case is fairly simple and is as follows: > > - Build threaded APR (--enable-threads) and httpd with worker MPM > (--with-mpm=worker) > - Start httpd with worker MPM (default config okay - 2+ processes required!) > - Issue an HTTP request against the httpd (i.e. apachectl status) > - *no response yet* > - Issue another connection and request against the same httpd (i.e. another > window w/apachectl status or whatnot) > - *Response from 1st request is returned* > - *No response to 2nd request yet* > - Issue another connection > - *Response from 2nd* > - *No response from 3rd until 4th request, etc, etc, etc* > > This worker MPM code works correctly on Linux, Solaris, AIX, Darwin, etc, > so we believe our pthread API usage in APR is correct. But, perhaps > someone familiar with FreeBSD can shed some more light on this. (If you > could pass along to David, that might be helpful!) > > We know 4.x still has this problem, and we believe 5.0 had it (at least the > original 5.0 did), too. But, I don't have access to a FreeBSD 5.x box to > test this. > > HTH. -- justin > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031113045131.GA5544>