Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:57:57 +0400 From: Alex Semenyaka <alexs@ratmir.ru> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Subject: Re: /bin/sh and BIG NUMBERS Message-ID: <20030407135757.GA14719@snark.ratmir.ru> Resent-Message-ID: <20030407180053.GA15818@snark.ratmir.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030406032450.GC4130@gothmog.gr> References: <20030405030629.GA2669@snark.ratmir.ru> <20030406032450.GC4130@gothmog.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 06:24:50AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> [snip rest of long-long using patch] > Nice idea, but we should probably ask the -standards people if we > can/should make this use uint64_t and %jd instead of `long long' > (using %qd is deprecated and %lld is advised in printf(3) anyway). Well I can remake the patch with uint64_t and repost it here, to -stable and to -current (original patch was for -CURRENT, of course). Will do in in couple of hours. SY, Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030407135757.GA14719>