Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:55:19 -0500 From: Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> To: Danny Pansters <danny@ricin.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, fcash@ocis.net Subject: Re: mutually exclusive OPTIONS? Message-ID: <442B1057.5000904@vonostingroup.com> In-Reply-To: <200603292353.15786.danny@ricin.com> References: <200603292344.52149.danny@ricin.com> <48051.192.168.0.10.1143668999.squirrel@webmail.sd73.bc.ca> <200603292353.15786.danny@ricin.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Danny Pansters wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 March 2006 23:49, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
>> On Wed, March 29, 2006 1:44 pm, Danny Pansters wrote:
>>
>>> I'm making a port that has several mutually exclusive compile-time
>>> options. I want to present them as OPTIONS as should, but is there a
>>> way within the ports framework to ensure that only one (of the 5
>>> possibilities) is selected, or when one of them is the default but
>>> then with 4 mutually exclusive OPTIONS if the user needs one of teh
>>> non-default options?
>>>
See ports/95085[1]. Thanks
Cheers,
Frank
[1]http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/95085
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?442B1057.5000904>