Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 15:32:59 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel J. O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Chris Piazza <cpiazza@home.net> Cc: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG, "James C. Durham" <durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us> Subject: Re: Blade Encoder speed Message-ID: <XFMail.990721153259.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <19990721220346.A3006@norn.ca.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On 22-Jul-99 Chris Piazza wrote:
> I have a K6-2 350 w/ 128mb of ram (running -current)
> using the 'gogo no coder' port (ports/audio/gogo)
Hey I didn't know that one existed.. neat :)
> 354:492 = 0.71:1.. not bad. (The quality is good too, btw ;-)
I tried Xing, Gogo, and Bladeenc on a Dual PII-350 ->
test.wav - 407s long
Xing Bladeenc Gogo (all at 128kb)
time(s) 111 525 256.91
ratio 0.27:1 1.29:1 0.63:1
I have only heard the output of Bladeenc, but I'll see what the others sound
like later on.
The Xing encoder is US$20 from http://www.xingtech.com/
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
iQCVAwUBN5Vbi2j0TqzKxF7VAQFfsgP5AVUbJPKjVQd7CUH6vuZ4RPkj4gaZPqf6
tEDRNZz4kPIrrmpoLd210t2qnH0taTE5bbC5IDoP5ZSRefS2aLLz/HzvLlTmeg8h
yO0+4DqukAwC+8omQpqQunlND6+AbxbRAXWbZ/Gv2Nz3O9Vo7hKyBgmQHvlnkHo0
CXL8/6HyZl8=
=fpwx
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990721153259.doconnor>