Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:41:57 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d/ike broken. retire it? Message-ID: <20060328184156.GA968@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <4426EF81.4090407@FreeBSD.org> References: <20060117075817.GA8473@droopy.unibe.ch> <43CCA738.20601@FreeBSD.org> <20060117101325.GB938@eddie.nitro.dk> <20060326112150.GC828@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4426EF81.4090407@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] [Cc: trimmed] On 2006.03.26 11:46:09 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > > So, I finally got around to adding an rc.d script to the isakmpd port. > > Thanks! If I can make one small suggestion, you might want to review the > section on rc.d scripts in the Porter's Handbook for a couple small points, > but other than that it looks good! Oh, I wasn't aware we had gotten such a section :-). I fixed the obvious things I noticed from the sample script. > > Both racoon2 and ipsec-tools also installs rc.d scipts now, so are > > there any objections to removing the src/etc/rc.d/ike script from > > HEAD? > > No objections here, please sharpen that axe! It's probably worth also > MFC'ing the change after the 6.1-RELEASE, IMO. OK it's gone :-). WRT. MFC, I guess anyone who actually uses the ike script (for whatever reason) can just tell mergemaster not to delete it, so POLA shouldn't be a problem? -- Simon L. Nielsen [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEKYN0h9pcDSc1mlERAuWPAJ9zM7hzTr8mU4VukO7x3O9jBkmTbQCfeJmK k2f26GzjI1wFOtRAYKNc+28= =Osfy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060328184156.GA968>