Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:36:47 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: dfr@nlsystems.com Cc: alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wither the nexus driver? Message-ID: <20020624.133647.130619727.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <200206242013.51504.dfr@nlsystems.com> References: <20020623233355.GE53233@cicely5.cicely.de> <20020623.215604.44113855.imp@village.org> <200206242013.51504.dfr@nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200206242013.51504.dfr@nlsystems.com>
Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> writes:
: On Monday 24 June 2002 4:56 am, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20020623233355.GE53233@cicely5.cicely.de>
: >
: > Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely5.cicely.de> writes:
: > : root node is the chipset:
: > : [67]cicely9# devinfo
: > : cia0
: >
: > OK. Is cia the only chipset, or are there others?
:
: I guess you are asking this question to decide where to put the implementation
: of child_present? Why not put it in root0? That way you don't have to touch
: all the MD drivers at all.
Yes. That's right. I didn't do that because it didn't occur to me to
do that. Since I didn't see root0 in the devinfo list on my box, I
didn't think that would work. Will it?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020624.133647.130619727.imp>