Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: very rough if_sk fixes
Message-ID:  <20040614102023.T93872@carver.gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0406141209170.94072@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
References:  <20040613181820.H84464@carver.gumbysoft.com> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0406141209170.94072@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:

> > I ran out and bought a Linksys EG1032 today and fixed up some of the
> > witness warnings and a detach panic.  I'm not 100% sure my lock relocation
>
> will your patch correct the LOR 011 [1] ?

(LOR skc0 vs kenv)

No, since i wasn't able to reproduce it on my machine. However, locks may
not be necessary in the attach case, according to scottl.  I'll need to
test removing the skc lock; if it works then I'll update the patch.

--
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040614102023.T93872>