Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:58:06 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
To:        Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RE: __asm help..
Message-ID:  <200012120158.eBC1w6S98258@earth.backplane.com>
References:  <XFMail.001208104618.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200012082129.eB8LTMM22955@earth.backplane.com> <20001212014220.E76746@hand.dotat.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:But if gcc breaks that assumption, that implies it would break
:alloca(), and presumably they wouldn't do that.
:
:Tony.
:-- 
:f.a.n.finch    fanf@covalent.net    dot@dotat.at
:"Dead! And yet there he stands!"

    alloca() is a GCC internal function, not a piece of __asm code.

					-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012120158.eBC1w6S98258>