Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 01:23:50 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Dispatcher <dispatch@blackhelicopters.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -stable vs -current (was Re: solid NFS patch #6... ) Message-ID: <199905040723.BAA55644@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 May 1999 15:41:51 EDT." <199905021941.PAA22423@blackhelicopters.org> References: <199905021941.PAA22423@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199905021941.PAA22423@blackhelicopters.org> Dispatcher writes: : For mission-critical systems, I'm still installing 2.2.8-stable. And the security officer still back ports relevant patches to 2.2.8-stale. The 2.2.8 -> 3.x transition lost support for several devices (aic being the mostly loudly complained about). Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905040723.BAA55644>