Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 23:46:57 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> To: Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> Cc: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@panke.de.freebsd.org>, chris@FreeBSD.org, wosch@baerenklau.de.freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/6307: sgmlfmt not `make -jN' ready Message-ID: <19990809234657.A80202@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <19990809160409.E772@holly.dyndns.org>; from Chris Costello on Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 04:04:09PM -0500 References: <199908090153.SAA09179@freefall.freebsd.org> <19990809213807.44902@panke.de.freebsd.org> <19990809160409.E772@holly.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 04:04:09PM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 1999, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> > This is not a fix, it is a workaround for a broken
> > sgmlfmt script.
>
> Should the PR, then, be reopened or marked as analyzed?
Technically, probably marked as analyzed. However, this weekend we're
doing the doc/ repository moves. ASAP after that everything under
doc/ moves to DocBook (the FAQ, and its translations, plus a couple of
the tutorials) and we remove the need for sgmlfmt completely.
I'd also note that sgmlfmt is not part of the base system[1], it's a port,
and that problems with ports probably don't belong in the doc/ PR tree. . .
N
[1] At least, not on my 3-stable system it's not -- it may have been, back
in the 2.x days when the Handbook and the FAQ were in the src/ tree
too.
--
[intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed,
non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs
the links.
-- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990809234657.A80202>