Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 11:16:48 -0400 From: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> To: Sulev-Madis Silber <madis555@hot.ee> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BeagleBone AI Message-ID: <A3D5366D-4D12-48B1-BA4E-811A4881DCE3@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAEawv968TySnsxNKMccsCMtpsVft7bNsa6CP8kLBAa7wpT3R0g@mail.gmail.com> References: <DCF67826-C2CA-461F-9A61-F934F6FB042A@cyclaero.com> <CAEawv96fgDjVtBtLUM2Y3wdD-4_Ev=ZXEC96sZ-xATq85ca9dg@mail.gmail.com> <54BFDAE5-67CF-4033-BD38-3F38F7FE70F8@cyclaero.com> <CAEawv968TySnsxNKMccsCMtpsVft7bNsa6CP8kLBAa7wpT3R0g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 30, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Sulev-Madis Silber <madis555@hot.ee> = wrote: > worth mentioning anyway, as ideas kept to oneself are useless ideas >=20 >=20 > somehow noone else has replied so far, including ones i consider more > competent on subject >=20 > to me, ti am* soc seems like solid option. unsure if one wants to use > c.o.t.s. board for industrial use, though? i mean as opposed to = designing > own pcb >=20 > when others finally arrive, they might want to correct me, but next > platform to consider (fbsd-support-wise) could be imx6 >=20 > then there are allwinner socs which seem to be like more oriented = towards > consumer mobile devices and rpi-class (media players?) >=20 > but nothing stops one from "abusing" readily available hw, if you = ruggedize > it and take appropriate precautions :) Note that there is an industrial version of the BeagleBone Black: = https://beagleboard.org/arrowbbbi <https://beagleboard.org/arrowbbbi>; Cheers, Paul.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A3D5366D-4D12-48B1-BA4E-811A4881DCE3>