Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:29:30 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ps on 4.0-current Message-ID: <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 Nov 1999 09:18:00 MST." <199911241618.JAA20883@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199911241618.JAA20883@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: >In message <199911241601.JAA20734@harmony.village.org> Warner Losh writes: >: sef has sent me patches that I've not had a chance to review that >: appear to implement this. > >Actually, these patches do something else. My mistake for reading >them before caffeine. So please explain the logic you want implemented once people have stopped haggeling about it, it is rather trivial. I pressume we want the same policy for /proc/*/cmdline as for the sysctl ps(1) uses ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35709.943464570>