Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 14:50:12 -0400 (EDT) From: float@interport.net To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: (fwd) Re: Linux flame wars not helpful (was Re: win95 vs nt4 workstation) Message-ID: <199805071850.OAA01742@interport.net>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Remember those discussions recently about renaming FreeBSD? I think we
have a winning candidate below. ;-)
Path: news.interport.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!209.150.160.22!newsfeed.wli.net!Supernews73!supernews.com!Supernews69!not-for-mail
From: willy1@rocketmail.com (Willy)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux flame wars not helpful (was Re: win95 vs nt4 workstation)
On Tue, 05 May 1998 17:20:32 GMT, geoffg@istar.ca (Geoff Glave) wrote:
>
>As interesting as these Linux / NT flame wars are, does anyone else have any
>answers to my original question about the differences between '95 and 'NT?
>
>I'm only really interested in those two OSes, and why NT is better, not linux,
>unix, FreeSomethingOrOther, win3.x, dos, MacOSAnything, java or TRS-80Dos, cp/m
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>commodore 64 sprites, or whatever the heck ran on an Altair.
These are from Microsoft. They're sort of helpful.
http://www.microsoft.com/ntworkstation/info/techdiff.htm
http://www.microsoft.com/win32dev/guidelns/apidiffs.htm
Sorry for turning your question into a flame war.
--
Ben
<Just Another System Administrator>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805071850.OAA01742>