Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:59:44 -0400 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kern/176446: [netinet] [patch] Concurrency in ixgbe driving out-of-order packet process and spurious RST Message-ID: <CAFMmRNyssUsPaHt66qkW-nRpENcAF1u5D67u6jAwpe3GvuC8og@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201303141500.r2EF01EQ079753@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201303141500.r2EF01EQ079753@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What's the benefit in having a both an interrupt thread and task that performs the same function? It seems to me that having two threads that do the same job is what is making this so complicated.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFMmRNyssUsPaHt66qkW-nRpENcAF1u5D67u6jAwpe3GvuC8og>