Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 13:19:43 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com> Cc: adrian@freebsd.org, wireless@freepsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: radiotap header bit definition allocation has changed ... Message-ID: <10703BFE-8D68-4A35-AA62-1DEC4261B9CD@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <CACyXjPzPBXcq=s-jhxKQHRkbSwTLcS0wceRTfmdzvB_uCjrebg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACyXjPzPBXcq=s-jhxKQHRkbSwTLcS0wceRTfmdzvB_uCjrebg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Richard. I’m not the person but I will forward on to the next person in the “May know more” chain and we can see if we can home in on the right person. Julian Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 11, 2019, at 10:57 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Julian, > > I dunno if you care about this, so maybe you can point me at who cares. > > I have just posted a change to Wireshark letting people know that > there are no more bit numbers available for new radiotap headers and > that radiotap has switched to using TLVs from now on. > > I did this because I am working with the S1G (has the stupid marketing > name of Halow, 802.11ah) folks and we needed a new radiotap header, > and they stupidly used a bit that is not available. > > Anyway, is S1G adapters get released (maybe next year) I imagine > people will want to support them on FreeBSD and capture software will > be needed ... > > so, someone needs to be aware of this. > > -- > Regards, > Richard Sharpe > (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者) >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10703BFE-8D68-4A35-AA62-1DEC4261B9CD>