Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 13:19:43 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com> Cc: adrian@freebsd.org, wireless@freepsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: radiotap header bit definition allocation has changed ... Message-ID: <10703BFE-8D68-4A35-AA62-1DEC4261B9CD@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <CACyXjPzPBXcq=s-jhxKQHRkbSwTLcS0wceRTfmdzvB_uCjrebg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACyXjPzPBXcq=s-jhxKQHRkbSwTLcS0wceRTfmdzvB_uCjrebg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Richard. I=E2=80=99m not the person but I will forward on to the next pe= rson in the =E2=80=9CMay know more=E2=80=9D chain and we can see if we can h= ome in on the right person. =20 Julian Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 11, 2019, at 10:57 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>= wrote: >=20 > Hi Julian, >=20 > I dunno if you care about this, so maybe you can point me at who cares. >=20 > I have just posted a change to Wireshark letting people know that > there are no more bit numbers available for new radiotap headers and > that radiotap has switched to using TLVs from now on. >=20 > I did this because I am working with the S1G (has the stupid marketing > name of Halow, 802.11ah) folks and we needed a new radiotap header, > and they stupidly used a bit that is not available. >=20 > Anyway, is S1G adapters get released (maybe next year) I imagine > people will want to support them on FreeBSD and capture software will > be needed ... >=20 > so, someone needs to be aware of this. >=20 > --=20 > Regards, > Richard Sharpe > (=E4=BD=95=E4=BB=A5=E8=A7=A3=E6=86=82=EF=BC=9F=E5=94=AF=E6=9C=89=E6=9D=9C=E5= =BA=B7=E3=80=82--=E6=9B=B9=E6=93=8D)(=E4=BC=A0=E8=AF=B4=E6=9D=9C=E5=BA=B7=E6= =98=AF=E9=85=92=E7=9A=84=E5=8F=91=E6=98=8E=E8=80=85) >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10703BFE-8D68-4A35-AA62-1DEC4261B9CD>