Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:22:44 +0200 From: "Morten A . Middelthon" <morten@freenix.no> To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top uptime! Message-ID: <20010422152244.D42830@freenix.no> In-Reply-To: <0104201829431V.20864@dehumanizer.meganet.pt>; from deh@meganet.pt on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:29:43PM %2B0100 References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104201901010.24366-100000@servww6.ww.uni-erlangen.de> <3AE07137.5B2EB5CB@acuson.com> <0104201825111T.20864@dehumanizer.meganet.pt> <0104201829431V.20864@dehumanizer.meganet.pt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:29:43PM +0100, Pedro Timoteo wrote: > On Friday 20 April 2001 18:25, you wrote: > > I'm not saying that Linux is more stable (I know it isn't, I use both), but > > in this case I don't think the stability of Linux is fairly shown here. > > Also (it's funny to reply to my own message), for a FreeBSD to have an uptime > greater than 1000 days, it's got to be an early 2.x. So, this list shows > nothing about the stability of 3.x or 4.x. I'm not *doubting* it's great, but > we'll only have "proof" when in 3 or 4 years there are some 4.xs still > running. I just lost my 320 day uptime on a 4.0-STABLE box due to power failure :( But, since it was rebooted I used the opportunity to upgrade to 4.3-STABLE :} -- Morten A. Middelthon Freenix Norge http://www.freenix.no/ -- You don't sew with a fork, so I see no reason to eat with knitting needles. -- Miss Piggy, on eating Chinese Food To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010422152244.D42830>