Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Mar 2002 19:20:03 -0800 (PST)
From:      swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen)
To:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: docs/36461: [PATCH] dd(1)
Message-ID:  <200203310320.g2V3K2T56668@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

The following reply was made to PR docs/36461; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen)
To: Tom Rhodes <darklogik@pittgoth.com>
Cc: keramida@freebsd.org, trhodes@freebsd.org,
	bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/36461: [PATCH] dd(1)
Date: 30 Mar 2002 19:09:44 -0800

 Tom Rhodes <darklogik@pittgoth.com> writes:
 
 > Italics isn't really a huge deal in my opinion, the only REAL worry
 > I had was markup.  Limited knowledge of mdoc(7) tells me to either
 > have a more experianced person review my work before application into
 > the system.  This is your call Gary, if you want it in italics just
 > say so and Keramida can commit his patch.
 
 I didn't know why italics was mentioned -- I never see it in manuals.
 But I just now read that ".Em" usually gives italics while I see
 underlined text from both ".Em" and ".Ar" (but bold text from ".Cm").
 
 I notice that the nslookup(8) manual uses Ar right of "=", but then it
 is describing interactive commands (.It Ic port= Ns Ar value).
 
 My call is Giorgos' last effort except with "Ar" on the right side of
 the "=" like the rest of the operands have, plus "Ar" on the
 corresponding reference to "value" in the description.  But I'll not
 complain if the committer wants it otherwise (as long as it has no
 spaces, of course).

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203310320.g2V3K2T56668>