Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 11:52:55 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 Message-ID: <XFMail.20030702115255.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030701183232.A24088@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01-Jul-2003 Juli Mallett wrote: > * Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> [ Date: 2003-07-01 ] > [ w.r.t. Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ] >> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:18:36PM -0500, Juli Mallett wrote: >> > * Gordon Tetlow <gordon@FreeBSD.org> [ Date: 2003-07-01 ] >> > [ w.r.t. cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ] >> > > gordon 2003/07/01 16:10:39 PDT >> > > >> > > FreeBSD src repository >> > > >> > > Modified files: >> > > . Makefile.inc1 >> > > Log: >> > > Switch the logic on the /rescue bits from NO_RESCUE to RESCUE, at least >> > > until there is a fix for cross building available. >> > >> > Maybe WANT_RESCUE? >> >> It should be temporary enough, but what is the policy for the opposite of >> NO_*? I know ports use WANT_*, does src generally use the same thing? > > WITH_LIBMAP is the only readily available example I can think of. Hmm. > Also, in the src tree we tend to spell things NO<foo> as in NOLIBTHR, > and so on. Actually, NO<foo> versus NO_<foo> seems to be a split. I prefer the version with underscores myself. Many newer knobs seem to use the underscore. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030702115255.jhb>