Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:21:28 -0600 From: Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Stable Mail Server And Web Mail Message-ID: <ade45ae90906011321q79e87a6cxa2f1c2dc94d9d01@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906012205570.33012@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1F9F36FCD9644D4683DADAF7DD62B412@john> <e63df4bd7c72721a1acb0afa0dd683b7.squirrel@relay.lc-words.com> <200905272209.28550.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <ade45ae90905291350x1f86bf4o2902530f412fb7f6@mail.gmail.com> <ade45ae90906011220y400b9315p4ea9238b36f1c2de@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906012205570.33012@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > I just had my first answer to this setup. only roughly 5% of the volume >> of >> > > on what planet do You live? really at least 80% of mail that comes to my > servers are spam. spamassassin deletes far over 95% of it fortunately. > > You don't follow context very well. with the setup I'm talking about, only 5% of the total volume currently received is spam. and that's a guestimate. My point is that this is 5% coming through without using an anti-spam product. I was trying to get a feel for the software combination I spoke about, how effective it was without anti-spam. And then I said that the last 5% can be cleaned up by using anti-spam software. I won't elaborate to you any more.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ade45ae90906011321q79e87a6cxa2f1c2dc94d9d01>