Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 08:55:20 -0500 From: Ajtim <lumiwa@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: Portmanager vs portupgrade Message-ID: <10272177.k8s2pG1s4i@lumiwa.farms.net> In-Reply-To: <20140123130817.7c75dc70@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <52E0FE75.9010504@webrz.net> <52E10D9F.7050003@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20140123130817.7c75dc70@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 23 January 2014 13:08:17 RW wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:39:59 +0000 > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > maintained by the same people (bdrewery mostly). portupgrade requires > > you to install ruby as well: that's probably the biggest deciding > > factor still extant. > > For me the biggest factor is that portupgrade doesn't stop on the first > error, it carries on building ports that don't depend on failed ports > and then presents a summary of the problems at the end. > > This is a big advantage on desktop installations where there are a lot > more ports and they are generally less reliable. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I am portmaster user from FreeBSD 7.0 and I want to switch to portupgrade. Should I expected some problems becaue everything is install with portmaster? Thank you. -- Mitja ------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10272177.k8s2pG1s4i>