Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:41:20 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> To: Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org>, arch@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base Message-ID: <20060301224120.GA33946@gurney.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <p06230908c02ba3dee4c9@[128.113.24.47]> References: <20060301170306.GZ55746@elvis.mu.org> <p06230908c02ba3dee4c9@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:18:07PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > Even > though I do like to work with multiple computer languages (and > in fact there is a lot I like about Modula-3), I do think a tool > such as cvsup needs to be in a more universally-available and > widely-known language. I like Modula-3 too (at least conceptually: I haven't found an excuse to code in it), but not "widely-known" is perhaps even an understatement. I came across this site the other day: http://www.tiobe.com/index.htm?tiobe_index Which I thought pretty interesting. I noticed that Modula-3 doesn't even make it into the top-100 popular languages, which puts it below Algol, Oberon, and Modula-2. Cheers, -- Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060301224120.GA33946>