Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:15:23 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Subject: Re: lp64 vs lp32 printf Message-ID: <20021010221405.G8817-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021009164506.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > On 09-Oct-2002 Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > >> [ddb/db_examine.c's use of %z] > >> Hmm, the second case doesn't even use a sign so it can be %x anyways. > > > > This seems to be just a bug. The original db_printf() prints -1 as -1 > > for %z format. From db_output.c rev.1.1: > > So should %z force sign on? > > --- subr_prf.c 28 Sep 2002 21:34:31 -0000 1.88 > +++ subr_prf.c 9 Oct 2002 20:41:53 -0000 > @@ -664,8 +664,8 @@ > goto handle_nosign; > case 'z': > base = 16; > - if (sign) > - goto handle_sign; > + sign = 1; > + goto handle_sign; > handle_nosign: > sign = 0; > if (jflag) > This seems to be correct. I have not checked any of this at runtime. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021010221405.G8817-100000>