Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:52:27 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, gibbs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: QUEUE_FULL_ENABLE option really work? Message-ID: <199604182252.PAA15314@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:12:53 PDT." <Pine.NEB.3.92.960418151140.314E-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Hmmm, well, my bonnie numbers didn't change much at all, and i was getting >"QUEUE Full" messages on my console, which have disappeared. Now if I can >get rid of the FS corruption on my 2940UW, I'll be a happy camper. (From >another message). You didn't mention that you were getting "QUEUE Full" messages on the console. The reason that the QUEUE_FULL_SUPPORTED define is in there is because we don't really handle Queue full status (that will change in the next day or two), but some people still use it because their drives have deep enough queues that they can use the additional tags safely. What kind of drive are you using? If its your RAID box, are you using multiple luns at once? (The number of tags to use is per lun, not per device.) -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604182252.PAA15314>