Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:47:39 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@secnap.net> To: "Brian A. Seklecki" <lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org> Cc: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: anyone using ssl accellorator cards in jail? Message-ID: <49DA403B.6020204@secnap.net> In-Reply-To: <1239038646.16390.2139.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> References: <49D22ADE.6070005@secnap.net> <1239038646.16390.2139.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 07:38 -0700, Michael Scheidell wrote: > >> trying to speed things up. >> > > I suspect that syscalls that support acceleration will simply fall right > through the jail into the host kernel. > > I'll be testing that some time next week -- so I'll let you know. I > don't think file handle access to /dev/crypto is required for Engine > support. > > Again, I'll let you know ~BAS > > thanks Brian. wonder if you need one card per virtual ip? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Integrator * 2009 Hot Company Award Finalist, World Executive Alliance * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness * Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 _________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ _________________________________________________________________________
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49DA403B.6020204>