Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:47:39 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@secnap.net> To: "Brian A. Seklecki" <lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org> Cc: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: anyone using ssl accellorator cards in jail? Message-ID: <49DA403B.6020204@secnap.net> In-Reply-To: <1239038646.16390.2139.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> References: <49D22ADE.6070005@secnap.net> <1239038646.16390.2139.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 07:38 -0700, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>> trying to speed things up.
>>
>
> I suspect that syscalls that support acceleration will simply fall right
> through the jail into the host kernel.
>
> I'll be testing that some time next week -- so I'll let you know. I
> don't think file handle access to /dev/crypto is required for Engine
> support.
>
> Again, I'll let you know ~BAS
>
>
thanks Brian. wonder if you need one card per virtual ip?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2009 Hot Company Award Finalist, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
_________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
_________________________________________________________________________
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49DA403B.6020204>