Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 17:08:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> To: Steve Spicklemire <steve@spvi.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: natd performance/fuction OK in 4.0? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006101706020.9920-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <200006101626.LAA12773@mercury.spvi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Are you sure the IPFIREWALL is only listed once in the kernel and that a module is not also loaded? One time I had bad, laggy performance and it turned out I had specified IPFIREWALL twice by accident.. On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Steve Spicklemire wrote: > >Hi Folks, > > I'm having wierd problems with Natd. I set up a 4.0 stable box >here at my place, and another at a client's. (I'd been running 2.2.8 >here for over a year.. with great performance so I'm pretty sure the >setup ought to work). Now when I upgrade to 4.0 here I get crummy >general network performance on the hosts that are masked. Actually, >I should be more clear, I get poor performace when they go through >*natd*. Also.. I had the oddest thing happen at the client's. When >I turned on the firewall rules (with a IPDIVERT/IPFIREWALL kernel) >the unmasked interface could ping, but not telnet, to the router. >I've never seen anything like that before. I'd love to get this >sorted out. Is there anything I can do to debug what's going on? >Do you have any suggestions? Things I could look for with >tcpdump? (Almost) Any comments would be helpful... > >thanks, >-steve > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006101706020.9920-100000>