Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 5 May 2012 13:26:27 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
Cc:        "arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org>, Alan Cox <alc@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Review needed
Message-ID:  <B286140B-2507-4A70-B33E-88DDA8C32F08@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120505181016.GB2253@funkthat.com>
References:  <EBCFF89A-18E8-48B8-A7BD-09C0B942DAB1@bsdimp.com> <20120505181016.GB2253@funkthat.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


On May 5, 2012, at 12:10 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:

> Warner Losh wrote this message on Sat, May 05, 2012 at 00:45 -0600:
>> I just tried to bring up an old Gateworks AVILA board that I'd acquired a long time ago....
> 
> Hmm... weird...  Late last year I brought my AVILA board back up on
> 9.0-RC1 and since I decided to try to boot from CF, I did have to
> update sys/boot/arm/ixp425/boot2/boot2.c to support the new ada devices
> instead of the old ad...  but that's the only major change I made...

This is with the G2348 config file.  Maybe that's the difference...

>> After fighting through a few bugs in the nanobsd build, I managed to get an image.
>> 
>> That image failed to boot.  When it harvested entropy, it just started printing pmap_mincore() over and over again until I hit ^T enough to let the rest of the boot process continue.  Sure enough, arm's pmap_mincore() returns 0 after printing this.
>> 
>> So, I cobbled together the following after looking at mips and amd64's pmap_mincore() functions.
>> 
>> I've just cut and pasted it here since I think that might be easier to review than a diff, but I've also uploaded that as well to http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/arm-pmap_mincore.diff
>> 
>> Comments?
> 
> Must be a head only thing...

No, it was a nanobsd-built stable/9 from yesterday

Warner



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B286140B-2507-4A70-B33E-88DDA8C32F08>