Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:07:17 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Heiko Schaefer <hschaefer@fto.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gbde data corruption? Message-ID: <51195.1051628837@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:25:32 %2B0200." <20030429162332.M20908@daneel.foundation.hs>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030429162332.M20908@daneel.foundation.hs>, Heiko Schaefer writes: >...replying to myself, > >apparently updating g_bde_crypt.c from rev 1.12 to 1.13 has effects on the >format of data or the layout of the encrypted filesystem. the stuff that >was on that mount with the old kernel is gone now. Yes, I fumbled a commit and slipped in some debugging code in 1.12. I've had 1.13 running my toture-test here for 38 hours now with no trouble. >> PS: i also have some performance issues with gbde, about which i'll whine >> some other time :) it seems to me that the transactions on the disc (the >> way i use gbde at least) are too small to reach the theoretical speed of >> the harddrive. Much worse than that: They get cut into smaller I/O requests and the cpu has to chew on them a lot. While GBDE is not directly slow, it will never be as fast as an unencrypted partitition. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51195.1051628837>