Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 22:46:30 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> Cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net>, current <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: sa_handler and sigaction... Message-ID: <20021226224630.B81014@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <1040949549.10056.9.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net>; from allbery@ece.cmu.edu on Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 07:39:09PM -0500 References: <3E0B422C.2000407@cvzoom.net> <20021226182742.GA1473@dan.emsphone.com> <20021227110226.A27921@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <1040949549.10056.9.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> writes: > I don't have the spec, but a perusal of secondary sources has > P1003.1-1990 specifying sa_handler and P1003.1-1993 adding sa_sigaction. > > I should add that sigaction() without sa_handler is almost entirely > useless for portable programming, so it would be downright bizarre for > POSIX to specify sigaction() and yet omit sa_handler. This looks like my bug. I'll fix it. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021226224630.B81014>