Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:42:25 GMT From: Andrew Thompson <andy@fud.org.nz> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/69360: WITHOUT_X11 forces x11 apps not to build Message-ID: <200407202342.i6KNgPca049465@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200407202350.i6KNoEbQ022266@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 69360
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: WITHOUT_X11 forces x11 apps not to build
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Tue Jul 20 23:50:14 GMT 2004
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Andrew Thompson
>Release: 5.2-CURRENT
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD hudson.fire.org.nz 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #2: Wed Jun 30 21:06:29 NZST 2004 root@hudson.fire.org.nz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HUDSON i386
>Description:
You can set WITHOUT_X11=yes in /etc/make.conf as a global setting, which would make sense on a headless server. Not all ports respect this and port dependencies can inadvertently install the X libraries, etc.
I think that if WITHOUT_X11 is defined, then all X application ports should unconditionally fail to build/install.
>How-To-Repeat:
apply diff
>Fix:
--- ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.orig Wed Jul 21 11:26:58 2004
+++ ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Wed Jul 21 11:29:15 2004
@@ -1504,6 +1504,9 @@
.endif # USE_MYSQL
.if defined(USE_XLIB)
+.if defined(WITHOUT_X11)
+BROKEN= "X11 support is disabled (WITHOUT_X11)"
+.endif
.if ${XFREE86_VERSION} == 3
# Don't try to build XFree86-3 even if ALWAYS_BUILD_DEPENDS is defined --
# it's just too big....
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407202342.i6KNgPca049465>