Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:25:49 -0600 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> To: Adam McLaurin <adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/flashpluginwrapper Message-ID: <opr3kv5bjg8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20040218031502.024ecbd6.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> References: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040218031502.024ecbd6.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:15:02 -0500, Adam McLaurin <adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> wrote: > On 18 Feb 2004 01:27:43 -0500 > Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> wrote: > >> Please reconsider removing flashpluginwrapper. I find it ludicrous >> that >> I should have to manually apply a patch every time I want to update my >> system. As flashpluginwrapper works, there is no harm in allowing it >> to >> remain in the tree until such time as -STABLE actually support >> linuxpluginwrapper. >> >> This port is not deprecated. It is still of use to those of us who >> don't >> wish to be manually applying patches to src all the time. >> >> # Adam > > Hmmm, who wants to remove it? I think many people are still using it > (myself included)! > > I second Adam's plea; don't remove it! I agree about to not remove it if this port is still function and work. If it's broke and nobody can fix it, then it's ok to remove it. Cheers, Mezz -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opr3kv5bjg8ckrg5>