Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 08:07:34 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: MK_ARM_EABI to retire in current Message-ID: <5D4F0BD5-89DA-421F-B095-A5F2C49F3DF9@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20140522090504.GA22488@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> References: <C66667D9-2F5E-44E0-AF04-E9DFE70BAF5A@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonSHCyD-8jpK0EPkctVwpJ%2BPu4dfBkvATdOS3yrN4ttVg@mail.gmail.com> <20140521192807.GA48338@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <95AD97BA-AA48-4BBF-845C-D0CB585ACAA3@bsdimp.com> <20140522090504.GA22488@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On May 22, 2014, at 3:05 AM, John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:01:42PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On May 21, 2014, at 1:28 PM, John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:50:21AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>>> isn't eabi on the xscale still broken? >>> >>> It might still be broken. But there are more brokenness than that. :-( >>> By defining WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes in src.conf, I can get an AVILA kernel >>> built that boots with src from head at around mid December. Latest 10 >>> and head just give no output, with or without WITHOUT_ARM_EABI defined. >> >> Does the same thing happen with make.conf instead of src.conf? > > Yes, I have tried both 10 and head with WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes and no > output after go in redboot. My compile lines look like this: > > make TARGET_ARCH=armeb TARGET_CPUTYPE=xscale toolchain > make TARGET=arm TARGET_ARCH=armeb buildkernel KERNCONF=AVILA DESTDIR=/arm/ > > And then in redboot "load -b 0x200000 kernel" to load it with tftp. And > then "go". > > The "no output" happened somewhere between mid December and beginning > of Feb. I determined that before getting side tracked. I'll see in the > next day or two if I can narrow that down. > > If someone have patches so that WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes is not needed > anymore, I'll test that too. This is with gcc, not clang, right? Warner > John > >> >> Warner >> >>> John >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -a >>>> >>>> >>>> On 19 May 2014 08:40, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>>>> Greetings, >>>>> >>>>> MK_ARM_EABI is going to die in current. It is the default for all platforms currently. I???m eliminating it as a build option. It must die because it invisibly (to uname) effects the ABI. >>>>> >>>>> So, to that end, I see two options: >>>>> >>>>> (1) Retire and remove oabi support. >>>>> (2) Retain oabi support, but change its name to armo and armoeb. >>>>> >>>>> The rough consensus of arm developers I???ve polled now, and in the past, is that we just let oabi support die now that EABI support is working for everybody. >>>>> >>>>> Before I pull the trigger on this, however, I must ask if anybody has a problem with my doing option (1), and if so, what keeps you using oabi. >>>>> >>>>> Comments? >>>>> >>>>> Warner >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTfgSmAAoJEGwc0Sh9sBEA1n0QAKczRTEdF0GnlH+NjqqlgQt0 FVsKAyB3CNCuC9xjqv9pTfcMH6NwBIjRGbtfDdqlp77JEjR4Os7WjIc/OIWMD3dF C1q2bkn8RHq4jafguaGfPjnVFF2AaSroHE1ICT3YXcpIAaZ237UKN7++zIN2QEbw K9mzf33RWs+U+N1tPJ31nHG8w1Yzeu5QF83vURQLE1Iq9bZ7oBONHI3MZhjibheK 3aIvpzTis0ctmvyI8KXoRzH7UhuDCnmIbE2UMaz5RzEwEzIb0bDxVlCCF9/F8B6i iqCTkubS4BBzucEK0MPPwwN2oQ5qhKg1+5W/nKKwWSZTwZ5UnAPcpqFrU+2Y3iW5 bcN98iE/nwx/mshDBCxFt67ymQ7/oH+LWIpOFFobiutSbKV6w/LuvkH262U6Q0+7 +eLZ1+LlogIsK0nWGvaTnjwEXn9k0xLJKgDKleXFmI/1a0fygPhQBO/D5CwPQIKb L8DDnH/yW3bPE5GXJ9jMobfPzP+SGkfi4/BNpculsurtpwrqSjwdapyjyv6lNc2G /GSBz5Fjvqn+oXrJyPp1GUwee3Gs1Ob9qccpAE9E/xwwP0F9kB/n5GwyRkwZq0Zu 0MQ/+k1e99X+CmApoX9bgU4vk5n7SMrTMFmwzO5muE0yce9G3Bxd1LxXTvbIt1+s F2i00pqdO0TVqGbQ5GwO =WpTB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5D4F0BD5-89DA-421F-B095-A5F2C49F3DF9>