Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 03:25:33 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/kinterbasdb Makefile distinfopkg-descrpatch-_kinterbasdb_constants.c Message-ID: <3FCEFD8D.3040104@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20031204120455.1e6b2d9c.Alexander@Leidinger.net> References: <200312040642.hB46gdJc053080@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031204120455.1e6b2d9c.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >I have an update for both firebird ports in the queue. I haven't >committed them as the package doesn't work yet. The submitter wanted to >fix this, but it seems he's busy at the moment. > >Should I commit the actual version? > > Hmm ... normally my feeling would be to say "go ahead and wait", but if the current versions are still the ones marked Forbidden (security reasons) then I think they should probably be committed as-is since they would be better than something insecure. Perhaps even with 'broken, won't package' in the Makefile? I can see valid arugments for doing things either way. I myself won't be using the port(s) so it won't make any difference to me, I was just trying to iterate over old PRs. I would be ok with whatever you decide. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FCEFD8D.3040104>