Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:12:35 +0000 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Julien Laffaye <jlaffaye@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for testers -- CONF_FILES variable Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmiLvMFiUWv3BLYd7UjxJpOH3DBAPBkT5wOL=wM2UhrGw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E109521.10209@FreeBSD.org> References: <BANLkTikvMU2dK=aN=hFgxA8wfvUitmfbRA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinBC184bwcQ1Sfyy9xsw9usqr3SJQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=nQByFgGNP--hkA4AF04Sw95s8jw@mail.gmail.com> <4E0C5B7A.5060102@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgnkxuGcNk8O7vz0aLFBo2jLU-G%2BxaXSAS1Zvik2%2B%2BYtiw@mail.gmail.com> <4E109521.10209@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The .pkgconf suffix tells pkgng that this file is a sample. But it could > also be done via an attribute. I would much prefer an attribute instead of a suffix for the reasons previously stated. I hope this is not bikeshedding the issue. > > Doing stuff with @exec or scripts should be for special cases, not for > common cases such as config files. Does something like @sample work? -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmiLvMFiUWv3BLYd7UjxJpOH3DBAPBkT5wOL=wM2UhrGw>