Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:48:40 +0700 From: zen <zen@tk-pttuntex.com> To: zen <zen@tk-pttuntex.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tproxy on freebsd Message-ID: <462C80F8.8070708@tk-pttuntex.com> In-Reply-To: <462C7896.9040805@tk-pttuntex.com> References: <46247471.9030503@tk-pttuntex.com> <200704172129.22275.sanya-spb@list.ru> <20070418095903.12432@caamora.com.au> <462575D4.2010801@tk-pttuntex.com> <20070418115654.30422@caamora.com.au> <46257D1A.7050808@tk-pttuntex.com> <d763ac660704172157q73cbefd8p9cb13597075eda7c@mail.gmail.com> <4626CA4C.7000104@tk-pttuntex.com> <d763ac660704181904m3e14a2e6qd93bf891f7cb2cdc@mail.gmail.com> <462C7896.9040805@tk-pttuntex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
zen wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current. >> We'll see what can be done. >> >> Thankfully! The solution for FreeBSD looks doable without having to >> keep NAT state like TPROXY does.. >> >> >> >> Adrian >> > sorry double post just want to _Know_ how's the progress regarding this issue. TIA Zen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?462C80F8.8070708>