Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:55:28 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Wesley Shields <wxs@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Tools/scripts README README.portsearch ports/Tools/scripts/modules buildmodules.pl Message-ID: <CAF6rxgk0Ym3Aa%2By3x53MpYhSA1DOFJgLD6whmOA6i=sNKf32ew@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20111227142755.GA62363@atarininja.org> References: <201112270332.pBR3WPZc022687@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111227142755.GA62363@atarininja.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Wesley Shields <wxs@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 03:32:25AM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote: >> eadler 2011-12-27 03:32:25 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> . UPDATING >> Tools/scripts README README.portsearch >> Tools/scripts/modules buildmodules.pl >> Log: >> - Remove some old duplicate words. They were getting in way of finding newer ones. >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.23 +2 -2 ports/Tools/scripts/README >> http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/ports/Tools/scripts/README.diff?r1=1.22&r2=1.23 >> | --- ports/Tools/scripts/README 2010/01/29 14:52:45 1.22 >> | +++ ports/Tools/scripts/README 2011/12/27 03:32:25 1.23 >> | @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ >> | -$FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/ports/Tools/scripts/README,v 1.22 2010/01/29 14:52:45 kuriyama Exp $ >> | +$FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/ports/Tools/scripts/README,v 1.23 2011/12/27 03:32:25 eadler Exp $ >> | >> | ardiff - compare two archives easily >> | addport - replacement for easy-import >> | @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ portsearch - A utility for searching the >> | fields. This option behaves differently to the other op- >> | tions, see the EXAMPLES section >> | >> | - -f file Use the index file file instead of /usr/ports/INDEX >> | + -f file Use the index file instead of /usr/ports/INDEX > > I don't think this was a duplicate word. It's letting you know that it > expects to find an INDEX file named "file" (for whatever you specify). > I thought about that but I'm reading the sentence use the index "file" instead of ... In other words "file" is a type of "index" instead of a type of "index file". -- Eitan Adler Ports committer X11, Bugbusting teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgk0Ym3Aa%2By3x53MpYhSA1DOFJgLD6whmOA6i=sNKf32ew>