Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:43:56 -0800 From: mdf@FreeBSD.org To: Benjamin Kaduk <bjkfbsd@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r244663 - stable/9 Message-ID: <CAMBSHm8fKkxMJZiAxhrO=5tqidEe2LwoqpNGOWvcd0WGJPrPPw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ5_RoBPdENKazPZT4vXibcfN_BUhVViHvOvu0CqcaPx0q1Jvw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201212241422.qBOEMrcF021632@svn.freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmokV-JL_xZ9otRXubKZ8KQKe7GgLuLU3UMij0HUD_KhCNw@mail.gmail.com> <50D8B533.8080507@mu.org> <20121225104422.GB53644@kib.kiev.ua> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212251911360.56707@fledge.watson.org> <CAJ-Vmo=oYfzxwEDYnXotx4b8qvnQTr4ofrLRkwkKH5C9GB0sMg@mail.gmail.com> <00E4FFFA-8ADB-4D43-B977-3834C48133E4@freebsd.org> <CAJ5_RoBPdENKazPZT4vXibcfN_BUhVViHvOvu0CqcaPx0q1Jvw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <bjkfbsd@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Robert N. M. Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> > wrote: >> >> When we talked to various VFS maintainers, looked at the past change >> history there, and looked at the set of third-party file systems >> (especially, those we could see in ports), the consensus there was that it >> was too difficult to define a stable VFS KPI and KBI for third-party >> modules. In particular, there appear to be at most one or two in ports at >> any given moment, and quick analyses of them suggested that their kernel >> feature dependency footprint was far more than just "vnode operations". > > > If OpenAFS is the only out-of-tree filesystem in ports, then most definitely > there are far more dependencies in place. I don't know how closely Isilon's > stuff keeps to our models KBI/ABI are not relevant for Isilon since we build universe every time. Changes to the KPI need to be tracked, of course. I don't know if there are other vendors with a custom filesystem who are not shipping a whole system (NetApp has a pretty odd use case AFAIK). Cheers, matthew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMBSHm8fKkxMJZiAxhrO=5tqidEe2LwoqpNGOWvcd0WGJPrPPw>