Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 14:31:31 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD mention in LWN interview with A.C. Message-ID: <19990217143130.G69668@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <36C9F60F.7AE40274@softweyr.com>; from Wes Peters on Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 03:49:51PM -0700 References: <XFMail.990216110915.jdp@polstra.com> <36C9F60F.7AE40274@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 03:49:51PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > As I said, Perforce is an excellent product with much to recommend it, > but probably not the best solution for FreeBSD. What we have works quite > well, because it was developed by highly motivated developers to pretty > much do exactly what FreeBSD needs. If only *every* development project > were this lucky. > > Especially Linux... ;^) http://www.bitkeeper.com/ Looks quite good. It is missing a number of features from my favourite (but not yet implemented) design, but it also has a number of nice aspects that I've missed... Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990217143130.G69668>