Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:17:42 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbuf header bloat ? Message-ID: <15892.44150.747656.722752@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030102160028.A25488@unixdaemons.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211232306410.28833-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <15841.17237.826666.653505@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20021125130005.A75177@unixdaemons.com> <15842.27547.385354.151541@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20021125160122.A75673@unixdaemons.com> <15842.51914.871010.137070@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20021126191526.B78371@unixdaemons.com> <15892.35521.181516.714686@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20030102152930.A25321@unixdaemons.com> <15892.42354.150878.922603@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20030102160028.A25488@unixdaemons.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bosko Milekic writes: > > Yeah, this looks like the least-intrusive way to do it. I'm okay with > the patch. I like the idea of using an EXT-type flag to mark the data > buffer types using this method. Thanks. Thanks.. Committed. > P.S.: Try not to use MEXTADD, if possible. Use m_extadd() instead, > which is the procedure-equivalent version. MEXTADD is just provided > for 'backwards-compatibility'. It used to be a large ugly macro. Oh, OK. That's fine. I'm happy to just use m_extadd(). Thanks for the tip. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15892.44150.747656.722752>