Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 16:17:47 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed overwrite clue? Message-ID: <199802180017.QAA03678@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:28:52 %2B0100." <19980218002852.55010@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > I think what you're seeing there is you're taking interrupts on two > > different stacks. The 0xefb* addresses are around _kstack, which is at > > 0xefbfe000. The other one could be the user stack. > > _kstack is the bottom end of the stack; the top end looks like it is > at 0xefc0000. All of the crashing addresses I've seen so far are in > the top 256 bytes of the kstack, so it doesn't look like I'm running > out of stack. Ok. Pity though, it would have been a convenient answer. 8) > > > I'm about to start trigging some crashdumps on purpose now, so I can > > > get a good look at how a dump for an OK case is. > > > > Do you have any custom code in the kernel? > > Yes. And the system won't boot without it, so ripping it out is > really not an option. I could try to revert as much as possible, but > it really doesn't look like any of the code that is revertible is at > fault; almost none of it has been excersised yet. The only reason I asked was inre: stack overflow. > And the exact same kernel run fine with another NE2000-clone (on > another port and IRQ, though, but there are no IRQ-conflicts). 8( Try matching the two, just in case this is a real heisenbug... -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802180017.QAA03678>