Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:54:18 +0200 From: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> To: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ovs-netmap forgotten? Message-ID: <593689DA.8000304@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <59367CF5.9080101@omnilan.de> References: <5926FFDB.7040900@omnilan.de> <592F20A0.4020702@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9i5ZJuz34WmnHfovtgX5o8a=yzpe18L8Qeoai%2B7wf4k6Q@mail.gmail.com> <592FC60A.1030308@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9i4wwjXYNata6eJKBAMeAeQ2YMheeev6_juStf42EhBTQ@mail.gmail.com> <5935A20A.6040000@omnilan.de> <59367CF5.9080101@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 06.06.2017 11:59 (localtime): … > Having other offloadings enabled or disabled (regardless if it's on > parent or vlan-clone) doesn't matter, … I must correct myself! At least when it comes to host-stack traffic. Keeping offloadings enabled on the vale-attached interface doesn't interfere with vale(4) traffic, but with host traffic. Since I don't know anything about the implementation of offloadings, I assumed it would affect vale packets, but the real effect is the opposite of what I expected, so the statment above is simply wrong, sorry. -harry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?593689DA.8000304>