Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 20:05:26 -0700 From: Bill Huey (Hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> To: Calvin Austin <calvin.austin@sun.com> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, "Bill Huey (Hui)" <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD HotSpot speed Message-ID: <20020802030526.GA3544@gnuppy.monkey.org> In-Reply-To: <20020801235356.GA2902@gnuppy.monkey.org> References: <20020714231141.GA2242@gnuppy.monkey.org> <3D330C11.5B9631E7@sun.com> <20020715221518.GA2820@gnuppy.monkey.org> <3D488314.1726D67B@sun.com> <20020801004920.GA2629@gnuppy.monkey.org> <3D488BC4.C4696AA2@sun.com> <20020801031438.GA2861@gnuppy.monkey.org> <3D493BDB.437924AD@sun.com> <20020801235356.GA2902@gnuppy.monkey.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hey, In a mail to Calvin Austin at Sun Microsystems.... On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 04:53:56PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > [HotSpot] > > I didn't get a chance to hack on that threading issue last night since I > was updating all my machine packages. The benchmarks that I've seen > demand money from you before you can use it. I'm probably either going > to write my own or adapt some other C language benchmark. It should be > trivial and I report back with the results after that. Dammmmn... "compiler1" was about 10x faster than "core" and competitive with gcc with -O0 with both of them coming in at around 3 seconds. "-O3" was 3x faster than both of those at about 0.97 seconds. HotSpot is definitely working and executing code very fast, so it's got to be a thread contention issue like you (Calvin Austin) mentioned before. This is really encouraging though. ;) Thanks for the clue. bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020802030526.GA3544>