Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:52:54 -0500 (CDT) From: "Paul Seniura" <pdseniura@techie.com> To: <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: just like midi/seq was treated? (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history) Message-ID: <20040628205254.C22B15C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> In-Reply-To: <20040628.095605.13314562.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <3949.1088292437@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040626.181218.21873777.imp@bsdimp.com> <40DF2607.5020409@mac.com> <40DF2607.5020409@mac.com> <20040628.095605.13314562.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message: <40DF2607.5020409@mac.com>
> Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> writes:
> : In other words, I care quite a bit about how "working, supported
> : functionality" gets transitioned to "no longer available". I'm not happy with
> : the notion of "supported" -> "HEADS UP" -> one week -> gone.
>
> It appears that this is widely used enough that it won't be removed.
> I agree that this is a too streamlined path.
>
> Warner
Not to change the topic of this thread, but --
I wish someone had said that a few weeks ago
while I complained about midi/seq support being
removed without a replacement.
...STILL waiting...
...wondering if 5.3-R is going to have it at all...
...and I still have _no_ idea
where it is being 'discussed'...
-- thx, Paul Seniura
System Specialist
State of Okla. D.O.T.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040628205254.C22B15C29>