Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:58:54 +0100 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com> Cc: Nicolas Martyanoff <khaelin@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net> Subject: Re: ZFS for a desktop computer Message-ID: <490DC02E.7020701@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <20081102144842.GA59552@hyperion.scode.org> References: <20081101114717.0ffc2ec8@valhala> <200811011517.37640.lists@jnielsen.net> <20081102144842.GA59552@hyperion.scode.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Schuller wrote: > I appreciate that supporting direct booting off of ZFS is not easy to > implement, and this is not any kind of complaint. I just want to > respond to the claim that there is no appeal to having it supported. I > doubt I am alone in thinking it would be great to boot natively off > ZFS, even if not every one under the sun agrees :) > Just to cast a "vote" I subscribe to this opinion. It would be great...In fact if direct boot from ZFS was supported I'd convert my work PC to AMD64+ZFS immediately. At home it would be hardware since my PCs have at most 512 Mb ram, which is more than enough for what I do here. -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?490DC02E.7020701>