Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 23:41:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 293382] Dead lock and kernel crash around closefp_impl Message-ID: <bug-293382-227-VtxQtABvFx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-293382-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=293382 --- Comment #86 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Kyle Evans from comment #84) Again to my amusement, there is a very close errata 1455 PCID-Based INVLPGB May Fail to Flush Global Translations but not quite. We do not specify PCID for global invalidation. Otherwise I do not see anything wrong with the code and description. But indeed, the formulation "to increment the virtual address at the 2M boundary" sounds strange. Why not say plain "to increment the virtual address by 2M"? Is there some english language nuance that I miss? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-293382-227-VtxQtABvFx>