Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 23:52:34 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bruno_Lauz=E9?= <brunolauze@msn.com> To: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: mlock and jail Message-ID: <SN1PR16MB0640DDC0DACEF22A63E7467FC64D0@SN1PR16MB0640.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
I would like to ask if there is a reason I would have to applythe patch below to make an application work in a jail. And who's bad? the app too intrusive or the bsd not flexible enough (allow.mlock?) Index: sys/kern/kern_jail.c =================================================================== --- sys/kern/kern_jail.c (revision 313033) +++ sys/kern/kern_jail.c (working copy) @@ -3340,6 +3340,11 @@ case PRIV_PROC_SETLOGINCLASS: return (0); + case PRIV_VM_MADV_PROTECT: + case PRIV_VM_MLOCK: + case PRIV_VM_MUNLOCK: + return (0); + default:help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SN1PR16MB0640DDC0DACEF22A63E7467FC64D0>