Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:54:20 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Ports failing with bsd make Message-ID: <20050102215420.GC60857@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <200501022250.38634.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <200501022117.48924.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20050102212335.GA58562@xor.obsecurity.org> <200501022250.38634.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:50:33PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Sunday, 2. January 2005 22:23, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:17:44PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > On recent -current, several ports are failing to build. Common qualit= y: > > > They all use the system make rather than gmake. > > > > > > Examples: science/hdf, textproc/Wordnet, devel/qmake. > > > > > > The errors all look pretty similar: > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D> mfhdf/nctest (all) > > > make: don't know how to make nctest.1. Stop > > > ... > > > > > > make: don't know how to make wn.1. Stop > > > ... > > > > > > make: don't know how to make qmake.1. Stop > > > > > > Looks like they're all failing while trying to generate manpages. Has > > > make become allergic to targets with a dot in them perhaps? > > > > Ruslan's NO_* change broke a lot of ports. He's currently on vacation > > for a few days, but I expect he'll fix these when he gets back. If > > you want to do it in the meantime (although we're in ports freeze > > anyway so this won't be committed until after), the port needs to set > > *both* NOMAN and NO_MAN (similarly for any other options like NOSHARED > > and NOPROFILE), for compatibility with both 6.x and older. >=20 > Hm - none of those ports set either NO_MAN or NOMAN at the moment (and is= n't=20 > this a base-system switch?). Is my build environment wonky? They're defined in software makefiles. -Kirill --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFB2G2MQC1G6a60JuURAnvFAJi/meblK3JvCHV5cwEiWMLLMxTZAJ924qbt BUpa63CKyECudcI4Uj94RA== =YrbC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050102215420.GC60857>