Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 09:06:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert J. Rutter" <rjr@sparks.empath.on.ca> To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VM problem (OK!!) Message-ID: <199609151306.JAA05405@sparks.empath.on.ca>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In a previous incarnation on local.freebsd-current, dyson@FreeBSD.ORG said: |> |> What option to set ? |> |For 256K cache 'options PQ_MEDIUMCACHE' |For 512K cache 'options PQ_LARGECACHE' |The default is to color for only a 64K cache, which provides only minor |improvements, but is much better than the random allocations that we |(and almost every other free OS) had previously done. I did a 'make world' on a 960913 -current and an i486 with 256K cache. I rebiult the kernel and rebooted, everything is ok. I then put 'options PQ_MEDIUMCACHE' in the kernel config and rebuilt the kernel. Everything is still ok. The kernel size and boot messages are the same. How do I tell if the 256K cache is being configured and used? Cheers, -- Robert Rutter rjr@sparks.empath.on.ca The thing I really like about Windows 95 is its artificial intelligence. For example, check the properties of any file with the extension "old". Windows 95 will tell you that it is an old file. What other major operating system available today has intelligence that is so artificial?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609151306.JAA05405>