Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 20:15:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Johan Granlund <johan@granlund.nu> To: cvs-all@Freebsd.ORG Cc: cvs-committers@Freebsd.ORG Subject: SVR4 emulation Was:(Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/linux linux_misc.c ) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907062008030.32559-100000@phoenix.granlund.nu> In-Reply-To: <199907052017.OAA57498@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : How can we possibly conclude that just fixing uname(1) will do it? Who > : says that there isn't a binary installation for some linux software that > : doesn't use the uname(1) command and so will possibly break because we > : report FreeBSD as the OS type? > A long time ago i tried to install Lotus Notes for Solaris to be able to read company mail at home. I _think_ the SVR4 emulation reported FreeBSD. After trying to patch the installationscript i finally installed on a Solarisbox and moved the installation:) If uname(1) in SVR4 emulation reports FreeBSD, could it please be changed? /Johan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907062008030.32559-100000>