Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:15:40 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <ersqpj$9u$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig947B101F7CFB2E2F49D51659 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kris Kennaway wrote: > 6.2 and 7.0 CVS sources (which are graphed on Jeff's blog and my > webpage linked there) are unlikely to differ much: as I said, filedesc > locking was key to fixing performance here. I'm sure we'll be > promoting this improvement heavily when 7.0 enters release cycle, to > encourage people to consider upgrading. Sorry, I was very imprecise - I meant 6.2 vs 7-current+patches from that benchmark. --------------enig947B101F7CFB2E2F49D51659 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF4e5yldnAQVacBcgRAnRnAKDelXQ2xdpRNlbIbSomPx9noyBkKgCg3lqC AaSCpHdljzhiI9Jf70e2vTs= =vXkJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig947B101F7CFB2E2F49D51659--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ersqpj$9u$1>