Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:21:15 +0300 From: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org> To: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org>, python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r371567 - in head/lang/python34: . files Message-ID: <805A5998-26F1-4CAB-A565-382C13509F9A@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAALwa8kHS%2BJDqcUXbUNQGQaG3=yBahft1EbjK_LYFaz4nnk6Yg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201410271254.s9RCs5ld049355@svn.freebsd.org> <CAALwa8kLq5GGUe=v3PPpup6=7QymPwH%2B8v5z6TAeimmyfqyomw@mail.gmail.com> <04B47323-0BE9-4FEE-99C8-E575E23B0230@FreeBSD.org> <CAALwa8kHS%2BJDqcUXbUNQGQaG3=yBahft1EbjK_LYFaz4nnk6Yg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 28 =D0=BE=D0=BA=D1=82. 2014 =D0=B3., at 12:38, Antoine Brodin = <antoine@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.org> = wrote: >>=20 >>> On 28 =D0=BE=D0=BA=D1=82. 2014 =D0=B3., at 12:29, Antoine Brodin = <antoine@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Dmitry Sivachenko = <demon@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> Author: demon >>>> Date: Mon Oct 27 12:54:04 2014 >>>> New Revision: 371567 >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/371567 >>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r371567/ >>>>=20 >>>> Log: >>>> Update to version 3.4.2. >>>> Two deleted patches were integrated upstream. >>>>=20 >>>> Reviewed by: koobs in D967 >>>>=20 >>>> Deleted: >>>> head/lang/python34/files/patch-issue21166 >>>> head/lang/python34/files/patch-issue21704 >>>> Modified: >>>> head/lang/python34/Makefile >>>> head/lang/python34/distinfo >>>> head/lang/python34/files/patch-Makefile.pre.in >>>> head/lang/python34/files/patch-Modules-_ctypes-libffi-configure >>>> head/lang/python34/pkg-plist >>>=20 >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> This fails to build on i386 (_ctypes/libffi error) >>=20 >>=20 >> Where can I see build logs? QAT link leads to empty page. >=20 > I have this log: >=20 > = http://gohan1.ysv.freebsd.org/data/101i386-default-baseline/2014-10-27_21h= 27m36s/logs/errors/python34-3.4.2.log >=20 Well, I can't figure ATM what's wrong with _ctypes and libffi. But the = proposed patch to use libffi from ports should fix that. What do you think about this patch (and to force it unconditionally for = i386)? BTW, I took a look at NetBSD pkgsrc: they always build python with = libffi from ports (--with-system-libffi).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?805A5998-26F1-4CAB-A565-382C13509F9A>